You are in the "Geometry / Trigonometry" section. Typically, one would cut it up into manageable triangles and other nice shapes. Let's see your early attempts.
Well, that's true enough, but if we know just a little more, we could do it. Thus my question. Perhaps the OP is not sharing all there is.
OP: Side length alone does not constitute a rigid structure for an irregular decagon. (Like it would for any triangle.) If you knew something about angles or coordinates of vertices (that you are not sharing) we might be able to get somewhere.
Of course, also, without showing YOUR work, it will be difficult for us to proceed. That's how we work around here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.