Amit Hasan
New member
- Joined
- May 15, 2018
- Messages
- 1
Find soln of PDE for given boundary conditions: (1/r)*∂/∂r(r*∂Φ/∂r) + ∂^2(Φ)/∂z^2...
I need to solve the following equation
(1/r)*∂/∂r(r * ∂Φ/∂r) + ∂^2(Φ)/∂z^2 + B^2*Φ = 0
for the situation where these boundary values are active
Ф(r>=R,z)=0, Ф(r<=a,z<=H/2)=0, Ф(r<=a, z>=-H/2)=0
My question is that which method can I use to find a solution?
I tried separation of variables but turns out that it only works when the boundary values can be reduced so that one BV only depends on one variable.
If I write Ф=X(r)Z(z), the BV Ф(r>R,z)=0 can be reduced to X(R)=0 because it does not depend on z.
But in this case the BVs Ф(r<a,z<H/2)=0 and Ф(r<a, z>-H/2)=0 cannot be reduced in such a way. These BVs depend on both r and z.
How can I solve this problem? Which method to use? I don't want a solution, just a point in the right direction. Suggest what I can study to gain knowledge for this please.
Thanks in Advance
I need to solve the following equation
(1/r)*∂/∂r(r * ∂Φ/∂r) + ∂^2(Φ)/∂z^2 + B^2*Φ = 0
for the situation where these boundary values are active
Ф(r>=R,z)=0, Ф(r<=a,z<=H/2)=0, Ф(r<=a, z>=-H/2)=0
My question is that which method can I use to find a solution?
I tried separation of variables but turns out that it only works when the boundary values can be reduced so that one BV only depends on one variable.
If I write Ф=X(r)Z(z), the BV Ф(r>R,z)=0 can be reduced to X(R)=0 because it does not depend on z.
But in this case the BVs Ф(r<a,z<H/2)=0 and Ф(r<a, z>-H/2)=0 cannot be reduced in such a way. These BVs depend on both r and z.
How can I solve this problem? Which method to use? I don't want a solution, just a point in the right direction. Suggest what I can study to gain knowledge for this please.
Thanks in Advance