Please show us your work.Heres the problem.![]()
Sent from my LGMS210 using Tapatalk
That's it.Please show us your work.
You posted numbers on the picture. Were they random numbers that you placed on the triangle? I doubt that. So yes, you can do better at explaining your work. Also you tried simplifying x (and did that incorrectly) but failed to define x. You can use any variable you like and tat is never a problem but it is a problem if you fail to define it.That's it.
Sent from my LGMS210 using Tapatalk
Thanks for helping, I am still confused and the answer to the missing side length NY would be of great help.You posted numbers on the picture. Were they random numbers that you placed on the triangle? I doubt that. So yes, you can do better at explaining your work. Also you tried simplifying x (and did that incorrectly) but failed to define x. You can use any variable you like and tat is never a problem but it is a problem if you fail to define it.
Actually, handing out answers is (as we've learned from hard experience) NOT of great help (other than to active cheaters). Instead, please reply with a clear explanation of what you did, and your reasoning, so we can try to figure out what's going on, and then reply with useful helps and hints.I am still confused and the answer to the missing side length NY would be of great help.