paperroutedn
New member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
- Messages
- 12
Can you please show me?31.55 is correct.
Maybe you keyed it into Symbo incorrectly - perhaps leaving out brackets somewhere??
You said:What arithmetic did I miss?
View attachment 25110
But why does it equal 31.55?
View attachment 25111
I tried to key this in Symbo Lab and Mathway it fives me 15 point something? Why
Thanks
You show me what you plugged in.Can you please show me?
Seriously, how can we show you what mistake you made in typing in your result if you do not show us what exactly you typed in?Can you please show me?
Maybe you typed in 1000 instead of 2000? If you double 15 point something you could get 31.55!What arithmetic did I miss?
View attachment 25110
But why does it equal 31.55?
View attachment 25111
I tried to key this in Symbo Lab and Mathway it fives me 15 point something? Why
Thanks
I actually have no problem with this. You can assert "let t=2" and that's fine. At many points in time during math you have to start asserting that a variable is taking on an actual value. They aren't asserting that t is always 2 but they are asserting that t is currently 2. It seems really harsh to take off a point because you would prefer students only use p(t) when they are talking in the general sense.Please do not write p'(t) = p'(2). I am sure that you know that p'(2) is a constant and that p'(t) is not a constant so how can they be equal?
Why I grade exams all I do is check equal signs and I assure you that you would have lost a point for that equal sign on my exam.
They ARE equal when t=2, which is what they say at the beginning of that sentence. If they hadn't said t=2, you may have had a point.Please do not write p'(t) = p'(2). I am sure that you know that p'(2) is a constant and that p'(t) is not a constant so how can they be equal?
With all due respect, I think it is up for discussion.When t=2, p'(t) does not equal p'(2). In my opinion, this is not up for discussion. p'(t) equals one thing while p'(2) equals something else. Equal signs must be valid.
I was wrong to say that this was not up for discussion. Sorry about that.With all due respect, I think it is up for discussion.
Do you agree with the following statement:
When t=2, t + 3 = 5 ? Surely that is true. Isn't it the same idea?
Oh No! That's scary.... Feline with opposable digits