Calculate the QM and the radius

chijioke

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2022
Messages
386
An isosceles triangle PQR has it vertices on the circumference of a circle. If |PQ| = |QR| = 17 cm, |PR| = 16 cm and m is the midpoint of |PR|. Calculate
a. |QM|
b. calculate the radius of the circle to the nearest whole number.
waec mat gce pic jpj.jpg
 
b. calculate the radius of the circle to the nearest whole number.
Have you heard of the formula: Circumradius formula.

\(\displaystyle r = \frac{abc}{4A}\)

where \(\displaystyle a,b,c\) are the side lengths of the triangle and \(\displaystyle A\) is the triangle area.

Or

\(\displaystyle r = \frac{a}{2\sin A}\), where \(\displaystyle a = \overline{PR}\) and \(\displaystyle A\) the angle opposite to it.

The formula gives the radius of the circle for any triangle inscribed inside when all vertices of the triangle touch the circumference of the circle.

If you are not allowed to use this formula and you want to solve the problem using pure geometry, you can construct the perpendicular bisectors.
 
Last edited:
I'd use these facts:
  1. QO = OR = r
  2. QO + OM = QM = 15
  3. QM^2 + MR^2 = QM^2 + 64 = r^2
but this is not the only approach.
 
Beer drenched reaction follows.
An isosceles triangle PQR has it vertices on the circumference of a circle. If |PQ| = |QR| = 17 cm, |PR| = 16 cm and m is the midpoint of |PR|. Calculate
a. |QM|
b. calculate the radius of the circle to the nearest whole number.
View attachment 39607

You're clearly suffering from some kind amnesia.
 
Last edited:
You're clearly suffering from some kind amnesia.
Relax man! It is very normal that people forget how to solve the same problem twice after some time passes. I myself who is considered the greatest Lord of mathematics in the history of this forum, I forget how to solve the same problem after one week from the solution. Now imagine this @chijioke who did it last time two years ago!

😒😒
 
Beer drenched non sequitur ramblings follow.
...
If I mind only my own biz, where is the fun in that? ...

Cockroach community dynamics is complicated. They eat their dead so that nothing goes to waste. It's best to stay out of their biz.
 
Have you heard of the formula: Circumradius formula.

\(\displaystyle r = \frac{abc}{4A}\)

where \(\displaystyle a,b,c\) are the side lengths of the triangle and \(\displaystyle A\) is the triangle area.

Or

\(\displaystyle r = \frac{a}{2\sin A}\), where \(\displaystyle a = \overline{PR}\) and \(\displaystyle A\) the angle opposite to it.

The formula gives the radius of the circle for any triangle inscribed inside when all vertices of the triangle touch the circumference of the circle.

If you are not allowed to use this formula and you want to solve the problem using pure geometry, you can construct the perpendicular bisectors.
1753937003388.jpeg
 
Since you got a different answer, what you did is simply wrong. The question is, why?

First, this work accomplished nothing:

1754050648370.png

Then, the following is just wrong; there's a major sign error:

1754050699700.png

In fact, [imath]r^2-(15-r)^2=r^2-(225-30r+r^2)=30r-225[/imath]. So the next line should be

[imath]30r-225=64\\30r=289\\r=289/30\approx9.63[/imath]​
 
I believe you've made a mistake here: the circled equation does not look right to me:
eq4.jpg
 
Top