sequence limits

forever119

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2021
Messages
2
let [MATH](a_n)_{n=1}^\infty [/MATH] and [MATH](b_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/MATH] be convergent sequences and let their limits be [MATH]s[/MATH] and [MATH]t[/MATH] respectively. Let the sequence [MATH](c_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/MATH] defined by [MATH]c_n=\frac{1}{n}*\sum\limits_{k=1}^n a_k*b_{n-k+1} [/MATH] then find [MATH]lim_{n \to +\infty} c_n [/MATH] I know that in this case [MATH] lim_{n \to +\infty}\frac{1}{n}*\sum\limits_{k=1}^n a_k*b_k=s*t[/MATH] I tried to use this fact but couldnt proceed
 
let [MATH](a_n)_{n=1}^\infty [/MATH] and [MATH](b_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/MATH] be convergent sequences and let their limits be [MATH]s[/MATH] and [MATH]t[/MATH] respectively. Let the sequence [MATH](c_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/MATH] defined by [MATH]c_n=\frac{1}{n}*\sum\limits_{k=1}^n a_k*b_{n-k+1} [/MATH] then find [MATH]lim_{n \to +\infty} c_n [/MATH] I know that in this case [MATH] lim_{n \to +\infty}\frac{1}{n}*\sum\limits_{k=1}^n a_k*b_k=s*t[/MATH] I tried to use this fact but couldnt proceed
Please show us your work till that point.

Please show us what you have tried and exactly where you are stuck.

Please follow the rules of posting in this forum, as enunciated at:

Please share your work/thoughts about this problem.
 
I think the idea is that if you go far out enough in the sequences the vast bulk of the elements will be very close to their limit.

You are taking a vector of the first n elements of a and dotting this with the reverse of the first n elements of b.

If n is large the bulk of those elements will be very close to their limits and in the limit are you multiplying the limit of a and the limit of b n times and summing. Normalizing by 1/n gets you back to the product of the limits.

You'll need to do some sort of epsilon delta proof where given sum epsilon you have to figure out how big n needs to be to get [MATH] \left |c_n - s t \right|<\epsilon[/MATH]
 
[math]lim_{n \to +\infty}\frac{1}{n}*\sum\limits_{k=1}^n a_k*b_k=s*t[/math]I can't buy that line above for a second.
Sure without the 1/n in the limit, the limit is st but with the 1/n the lim will be 0.

Remember that the limit of a product is the product of the limits which is 0*st=0
 
let [MATH]a_n = A, b_k = B[/MATH]
[MATH]\sum \limits_{k=1}^n a_k b_k = n A B\\ \dfrac 1 n \sum \limits_{k=1}^n a_k b_k = AB[/MATH]
So I'm not sure what you're thinking when you say the [MATH]\dfrac 1 n[/MATH] in front causes everything to go to zero.
 
let [MATH]a_n = A, b_k = B[/MATH]
[MATH]\sum \limits_{k=1}^n a_k b_k = n A B\\ \dfrac 1 n \sum \limits_{k=1}^n a_k b_k = AB[/MATH]
So I'm not sure what you're thinking when you say the [MATH]\dfrac 1 n[/MATH] in front causes everything to go to zero.
I agree with everything you wrote. I just do not know why you wrote it. The OP said let [math](a_n)_{n=1}^\infty\ and\ (b_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/math] be convergent sequences and let their limits be s and t respectively. The OP never said that that the terms of an and bn were constants. Does that change everything?
 
I am beginning to see that I am wrong. I just need to see why the OP is correct. I just need to read all of this again. Thanks!
 
I agree with everything you wrote. I just do not know why you wrote it. The OP said let [math](a_n)_{n=1}^\infty\ and\ (b_n)_{n=1}^\infty[/math] be convergent sequences and let their limits be s and t respectively. The OP never said that that the terms of an and bn were constants. Does that change everything?

That was just a simple example of how taking the average of something doesn't necessarily make it go to zero.
 
[math]lim_{n \to +\infty}\frac{1}{n}*\sum\limits_{k=1}^n a_k*b_k=s*t[/math]I can't buy that line above for a second.
Sure without the 1/n in the limit, the limit is st but with the 1/n the lim will be 0.

Remember that the limit of a product is the product of the limits which is 0*st=0
have you ever read any real analysis book???
 
Top